> If a single "it went badly enough to wind up in the NYT" case means Google is a no-go,
I think we are beyond 'one' case going wrong with Google services like YouTube, Drive, etc which the result of automated bans have made people realize that Google owns whatever you put on their services and can remove whatever they 'think' violates their ToS.
> I've got really bad news for you about blockchains.
Yet, I made no mention about or storing data on the 'blockchain', since IPFS is not a blockchain.
I think we are beyond 'one' case going wrong with Google services like YouTube, Drive, etc which the result of automated bans have made people realize that Google owns whatever you put on their services and can remove whatever they 'think' violates their ToS.
> I've got really bad news for you about blockchains.
Yet, I made no mention about or storing data on the 'blockchain', since IPFS is not a blockchain.