Yes, this, along with the README comments from others makes it look like it's pretty dated.
It's still impressive but it does seem to be largely one main contributor (plus one other reasonably significant contributor) and not much buy-in by the community to improve even fairly low hanging fruit such as typos, cleaning out old cruft etc.
It's still impressive but it does seem to be largely one main contributor (plus one other reasonably significant contributor) and not much buy-in by the community to improve even fairly low hanging fruit such as typos, cleaning out old cruft etc.