Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't understand this comment. SUVs are classified as passenger vehicles. They're also getting larger (and more dangerous for pedestrians), but to nowhere near the same degree that pickup trucks have.

The danger posed by pickup trucks is chiefly a function of the absence of regulation: the US has decided that you can role-play as a farmer and get treated as one for safety purposes, without actually demonstrating a need for a car that's patently unsafe for US streets and highways.



It's complicated because the SUV label is arbitrarily used by manufacturers and consumers, but many/most SUVs are classified as light trucks for safety and emissions purposes.

https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/fact-726-may-7-2012-suv...


My bad -- I thought that SUVs and "crossovers" were the same type of car, but the former is (apparently) typically the same platform as a light truck, while the latter is more typically a compact car or station wagon platform.

Far be it from me to defend truck-style SUVs!


Can you offer an example of any consumer product where you have to "demonstrate a need" before you're allowed to purchase it?


I'm not saying that we ought to restrict truck sales based on need -- I'd be perfectly happy restricting them to county roads only and requiring additional licensing and/or certification (similar to a CDL).

But since you asked: just about anything that can be turned into an explosive. Or, you know, prescription medicine.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: