Nitpicking, but the authors aren't actually journalists, they're professors in psychology and cite their own research in the article. Just goes to show it's not always journalists twisting the scientists' work trying to get a juicy piece, sometimes it's the scientists themselves. I don't know if they are twisting the results of their work or not, but it does seem like this piece was a bit fluffy and does as much jumping to conclusions as the stuff that it aims to take down.