Godwin’s Law strikes again. Free git repository hosting is not comparable to the holocaust.
If you want some quotes from their website, here’s another:
> GitHub has the right to suspend or terminate your access to all or any part of the Website at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice, effective immediately. GitHub reserves the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.
> This Agreement supersedes any proposal or prior agreement oral or written
> Free git repository hosting is not comparable to the holocaust.
Where did I compare it to the holocaust?! I was trying to pinpoint that your previous statement: "They do have a moral obligation to follow the laws of the country they operate in, though." is clearly invalid.
It is possible to have two competing and contradictory moral obligations, that does not mean that either moral obligation ceases to exist. I think "save lives if possible" out weighs "follow the law", but that doesn't mean that the moral obligation to abide by the law goes away. I do think it is often moral to break the law, but it has to be in service to a greater morality.
Your are equating the morality of opposing the Holocaust with the morality of opposing sanctions in that you assert that they both out weigh the moral obligation to follow the law.
If you want some quotes from their website, here’s another:
> GitHub has the right to suspend or terminate your access to all or any part of the Website at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice, effective immediately. GitHub reserves the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.
> This Agreement supersedes any proposal or prior agreement oral or written