Trust me I am right there with you; Haskell does a lot of really beautiful things. Python lifted its list comprehension syntax from Haskell, as a matter of fact. It is only that I consider it a core responsibility of programmers to take into consideration the poor sap who has to maintain their code once the original author gets hit by a truck or eaten by a shark.

> hopefully the language itself will support this one day, and then my ugly hack can go away.

+1 here, but I'm not holding my breath. Python's BFDL has been hostile to making lambda more powerful; I'm not sure what he would think about this.

I think the syntax is fine. The star operator already is sensitive to the operands, so you're not impairing readability at all.

I'd really love to see an operator for this in Python as well. I feel it's lacking.

Python's an object-based, highly dynamic, systems language. It's got a big set of builtins, a relatively large standard library, and is based around iteration and composition. It's not what I would consider a "little" or "fp" language. Sure, you can write pure, referentially-transparent units in Python, but sometimes you have to write things that set! attributes, and that's just a part of life.

Overloading these operators on function objects really isn't the end of the world. It's not like these operators were being used for anything, and sometimes this kind of DSL-ish extension can be good. It's certainly more reasonable than the goto module, which uses horrid bytecode hax to get the job done.

If you want this in the language, write to the python-ideas mailing list, and then draft a PEP if you get any support. Good luck!