The Apache Software Foundation would also prefer this, per their trademark policy: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#guide

I think context matters and the title "Airflow's Problem" doesn't make much sense when talking about the physical phenomenon of flowing air.

Not really, the past two years have seen probably a order of magnitude increase in interest and articles about industrial-scale ventilation and air quality.

You still wouldn't phrase it like "Airflow's Problem" because the concept of airflow is incapable of having a problem. It just exists. Some theories _about_ airflow may have problems, but then you would specify that in the title.

I disagree. The concept of airflow is a human model to describe a physical phenomenon, it might be that we have nailed it.. It might be someone has found a problem with the model, and or some new insight, that they wanted to share..