Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Germany is today burning less coal than would have been necessary if they had refurbished their nukes instead of spending the money building out wind.

Operating the wind farms is much cheaper than operating the nukes and mining the extra coal would have been. That opex savings goes to more capex wind generation capacity, further reducing costs by each GW displaced.

So, yes, success. Not being off coal already is not failure. Replacing an entire country's energy infrastructure takes time, no matter what.



> Germany is today burning less coal than would have been necessary if they had refurbished their nukes instead of spending the money building out wind.

Looks at France

Sure.


France is, at the moment, importing power, because their nukes are largely turned off. So, sure, look at France.


And are a net exporter by around 10%. Meanwhile in Germany: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/germany-turns-electrici...


You are comparing emergency war response to energy policy. Desperate much?


You're the one comparing the worst heat wave in recorded history to business as usual.


You seem to imagine that heat waves are not now normal.


Yes, imagine thinking that the hottest day in record across Europe is not something that will happen daily.


Every couple of years we get a new "hottest on record". Maybe look up global climate disruption records?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: