Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

(OP here) I'm learning that in this case I was lucky that the party was A: identifiable, B: also in CA, C: responsive to a suit, and D: willing to settle out-of-court (mailed me a check). I hadn't realized that collections of a small claims judgement could be super-involved but apparently I was simply naive on that topic.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: