I’d definitely agree with that. I get more of an amateur interested in history (and from a quite strong English bias, at that) vibe than someone trying to present historical research, but it’s good to call that out.
There are actually several (maybe even most/all?) channels above that I would describe as “interesting voices” rather than “credible, non-biased experts” so take them with a grain of salt.
There are actually several (maybe even most/all?) channels above that I would describe as “interesting voices” rather than “credible, non-biased experts” so take them with a grain of salt.