Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, we can’t claim that. It would still be at best an approximation. Perhaps more accurate and/or precise than what we’ve got now, but an approximation nonetheless. We’ve long ago given up on even getting close to what you propose anyway.


I’m saying it would be a reasonable definition of complete, and no we absolutely have not given up on a theory of all phenomena




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: