The hardest part of using Ruby on Rails is hiring, in my experience and opinion. There are lots of Ruby developers, but there's a lot more with experience in other languages.
I disagree. It is much easier to make big changes, especially refactors, using a language such as TypeScript. The amount of `undefined method 'example_method' on NilClass` errors in Ruby on Rails projects is astounding. After working with a typed language on the backend, I am confident it is easier to more quickly ship correct code with a typed language, while Ruby on Rails makes it easier to quickly ship incorrect code.
I'll work pretty much everywhere with any tech in any domain but never on something significant without tests. You spend all your time putting out fires. It sucks the life out of you.
When I had to work on Java/Javascript, I had to fallback to using `any` so often, to get the compilers to work, I gave up on the idea that strong typing is useful. Maybe it's fine for simple types, but trying to pass non-trivial structures around was way more trouble than it was worth.
Are you sure of what you're asking? Yes, the Java side was fine. I frequently had to use "any" on the Javascript side because it couldn't understand my compound types. They parsed fine in code, but the compiler would choke.
not my experience. after three months in a rails skip shop my productivity sucks. It also lacks language appeal (eg i joined current company in spite of rails). Its a great framework to be sure, but if you dont have a pool of rails devs to hire, IMHO id choose something more popular.
