Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You know how you get software engineering candidates that look awesome on paper, but can't code FizzBuzz?

Same reason.




This is a great way to put it. People here are bashing SOC2 because it doesn't go in-depth enough, it's just checking for the basics, it doesn't actually stop hackers from accessing insecure AWS buckets or ransomware attacks, etc etc, and they're absolutely right.

But it's meant to be a minimum. It verifies that there isn't one copy of the source code on a dev's laptop. It verifies that a dev who gets fired won't be able to log into the production server and delete all data in retaliation. It verifies that an intern isn't able to completely destroy the business by accidentally deleting the production database (because you have routinely tested backups and a documented RTO/RPO, of course). Being able to demonstrate this level of minimum competency is extremely valuable when you're in the B2B world and trying to sell your product to a larger client.

The paperwork is a hassle, but if your company is following best practices for development and operations, there shouldn't be much of a step change in what you're actually doing on a day-to-day basis.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: