and these are from outside India like you were claiming?
My point was there was sufficient Hindu diaspora outside but it has not been involved with violence of religious nature and are mostly considered model minorities.
The problem in India is well known, and it is an actual issue there. Although, I will add all of the events you mentioned have precursor events to them as well; not that that justifies anything.
Exactly. No one is talking about how a Muslim tailor was killed by a bunch of Hindus and brazenly captured in video which also threatened the country's PM of a similar fate. The Hindu community then proceeded to pelt stones on the Police which came to arrest the killers.
remember akhlaq who was killed for allegation of eating beef, by hindu terrorists of india? Remember the hindu terrorist shambhu lal regar, who killed a man on live facebook, then proceeded to burn his body.
it's high time the world recognizes this issue and places security concerns in respective countries for people having such bent of mind.
Your language is one which is mostly employed by leftists Congressis, psuedo-liberals and radical Muslims in India. This "Hindu terrorist" word has been coined by such people to whitewash the horrific crimes done by radical Muslims in India and all over the world.
Do you have a single incident to show where Hindus have been involved in a terrorist activity in any part of the world?
