Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Is it an effective strategy at all? I can imagine that turning up the heat without any benefits is just as likely to chase the most talented people away.



I disagree, though it greatly depends on how "turning up the heat" is done.

There is not a lot that is more demoralizing to top performers than to see dead wood continue to plot along and earn a sizable paycheck and produce little of value. And it's not even all solely an envy issue - it's also an issue of poor performers getting in the way and making other people's job more painful and inefficient.

So a message of "we're going to start getting real about ensuring our high bar is met, and having hard conversations with people who consistently don't meet that bar" is something that some folks would look forward to.

Of course, like I said, the devil is in the details, and if "turning up the heat" means we're going to have more time cops than yes, I think it would be demoralizing.


The stock value has dropped by over half and meta is preparing for a recession. Ad sales and user growth have already slowed.


If it's just reviewing people at a higher standard, I don't see how that'll turn high performers away.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: