Sounds like you're fighting confirmation bias with confirmation bias.
Your points are valid, don't get me wrong, but there is also a lot of research causally linking microbiome deficiencies with various health problems.
Also worth noting your shots seem more aimed at the journalist's style than the researcher's work. I for one, think this is super valuable and promising research
> Your points are valid, don't get me wrong, but there is also a lot of research causally linking microbiome deficiencies with various health problems.
I’m sure there is. But it isn’t in this article. So reading this to learn about it is a waste of time.
> Also worth noting your shots seem more aimed at the journalist's style than the researcher's work.
That’s a correct assessment, yes.
> I for one, think this is super valuable and promising research
A good source for that conclusion may exist, but this isn’t it.
Your points are valid, don't get me wrong, but there is also a lot of research causally linking microbiome deficiencies with various health problems.
Also worth noting your shots seem more aimed at the journalist's style than the researcher's work. I for one, think this is super valuable and promising research