yeah, totally understand. i don't think this is the best and final form of onboarding, but we decided to use this approach to 1) do a better job matching 2) eliminate irrelevant jobs.
there are lots of job boards out there with tons of jobs. even if we have thousands of roles on the platform, we want you to see only ones that were made to feel like they're perfectly suited to you.
the implementation of what you're asking for sounds like Indeed or LI, which imo, surface pretty subpar jobs and none that are that relevant for me.
The questions are fine, though some of the skillsets could be refined. The problem is that you require potential job seekers to give up personal information to even see any of the positions that match. At least give a sample of results before requiring a signup. A serious job seeker is going to go elsewhere before signing up for an unknown.
I agree with the other comments. I went through the entire form and got to the place where you had to enter personally identifying information and nope-d out. Judging from past comments on this site, I'd wager you're losing a lot of valuable would-be users with this onboarding flow. I like the design, I like the little questionnaire, but all of that doesn't matter if you betray my trust as a user with a dark pattern like that.
there are lots of job boards out there with tons of jobs. even if we have thousands of roles on the platform, we want you to see only ones that were made to feel like they're perfectly suited to you.
the implementation of what you're asking for sounds like Indeed or LI, which imo, surface pretty subpar jobs and none that are that relevant for me.