Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

My view is a little more negative because of all the hype it gets but only a little. It's just a bad movie.

SPOILER WARNING

To understand the plot structure (such that it is) in Interstellar, you have to start with the writer's desire for the emotional ending of the main character with his daughter, who is now old. Everything that happens in the movie is a really forced way to reach that outcome.

The whole watch time-travel thing was more of that illogical nonsense in service of that conclusion.

The time dilation to make all this happens just doesn't work that way. You have to get to a significant percentage of c before time dilation becomes really noticeable. For example, at 0.9c you're still only at ~2x time dilation [1].

The gravity effects of the black hole don't make sense either.

The "science" of Interstellar is no more realistic than Star Trek or Starship Troopers.

[1]: https://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/timedial.html




I mean I agree, on the other hand if it's no more realistic perhaps this means that the fiction part of science fiction actually takes precedence despite coming second and thus is actually not any sort of evidence of its being a bad movie.


Odd. I didn’t like interstellar either, but time dilation in the vicinity of a supermassive black hole is way, way less controversial than being able to build a wormhole large enough for a ship to get through.

Possibly you’re confusing stellar mass black holes and super massive black holes?

Time dilation doesn’t only occur at high velocities, so your link focusing entirely on velocity is accurate, but I think not really relevant.

The physics was pretty reasonable for the time dilation. Possibly off by an order of magnitude or so, but not ridiculous on its face.

Except for the wormhole.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: