That is the ideal, sure. In practice though, science is whatever scientists do.
And as seen here, sometimes scientists don't actually follow the scientific method, they fall trap to entrenched interests and other biases.
The people that tell you "trust the science" are not usually suggesting you get a PhD and study this yourself. They are actually suggesting you trust the scientists - which may or may not be good advice based on the field (e.g. trusting physicists, climate scientists, virologists: good; trusting dieticians, Alzheimer's researchers: possibly bad).
In general, where a set of ideas are protected, despite contrary, high-quality, evidence, this is the opposite of 'trusting the science'.