His flexible-nav jquery library he is using on the demo page looks actually more interesting than the slider.js itself - http://demo.greweb.fr/flexible-nav/

Reminded me of the navigation on a javascript documentation website posted a little while ago : http://bonsaiden.github.com/JavaScript-Garden/

I am seeing more and more of these all over the place and I think they are great for long pages! Would love to see more of them instead of table of contents on documentation websites (for example, using something similar on a site like the HTML5 spec : http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ would make the navigation a lot more efficient)

Agreed! Was more impressed with the nav, but that's probably because I'm on old hardware/slow connection so the slideshow was very sluggish for me.

Very nice! There are a lot of rotator plugins out there, but yours seems very complete and robust. I will definitely be using this in future projects since our clients always want more fancy sliders. Thanks again!

What business are your clients in? I tend to think of slideshow transitions as something users find enjoyable only for a very short time. (I run a photosharing site -- http://ourdoings.com/ -- where I recently redid the slideshow to use photoswipe, which works well on touch devices but does not do fancy transitions.)

Our clients are typically churches and small business who like to have banners on their home pages. There's always something "featured" that they want to show off.

That use case makes sense to me -- a quick attention-getter.

Bummer, the images display not at all with JavaScript turned off and there's no way to link to a specific image. Degrade gracefully y'all.

Perhaps it's the responsibility of each website using slider.js to degrade gracefully on their own. That seems more appropriate to me. In which case, I don't mind if they don't bother to degrade while demoing their javascript product.

Are you really demanding that the author of an open source javascript project to supply non-javascript code to make your website backwards compatible? You've gotta be kidding me.

That's not his responsibilty at all. Try contributing to an open source project instead of complaining.

Yep, I absolutely expect that. Especially on the example page.

Problem solved:

It's very easy to handle a Javascript fallback for Slider.js: Instead of having an empty container in which your slider will be templated, put the content for the non-javascript into it.

That's it ;) Just because the Slider Javascript will empty the content of it ;)

(Side thought: maybe I'm wrong, but in 2011, are we still need a JS backwards?)

So now you have 2 problems:

1) Your website requires backwards compatibility

2) It's not his problem

Better whine and complain on the internet until someone fixes your problems for you.

Yeah, I can't even scroll the page on Chrome

As a ux / design type person, I'm turned off by the design of the prev, next and slide selectors.

I know that's not the main purpose of the JS library, however, I'd spend a little time making it look pretty:

Here are some ideas: http://dribbble.com/search?q=slideshow

Great work though so far!

Thanks for your ideas! The slider engine is here, you are free to style it :)

This is just great, huge potential, looking forward to giving it a try. Congrats to author!