Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Well, comparing the stats:

The US seems to have higher murder, but less per capita crimes against people (eg, rape and burglary).

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Australia/...




I'm going to go out on a limb here and say those statistics are laughable.

Have a look at the order of all countries:

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Burgla...


What about the european countries without "equalizers"?

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Spain/Unit... https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Germany/Un... https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Denmark/Un... https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Italy/Unit... https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/France/Uni... https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Austria/Un...

> You see an increase in crimes against people when the equalizing force of guns is removed: assaults, muggings, home invasions, rapes, etc. Guns can (and do) allow smaller men, women, and the elderly to defend themselves with lethal force — against stronger aggressors.

Sorry but to my european ears, this "equalizing force" theory sounds plain stupid. I get that it is not that easy to ban them because we have different traditions and background, and I get that it is really hard to ban something when people is used to it and that it could lead to unexpected consequences (black market, etc).

But defending guns as an "equalizing force" is just stupid, given the stats.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: