I don't think there's a double standard. People often jump to that conclusion after they see a few data points they dislike, but this is fraught with bias because data points you dislike stand out more.
Howe many people need to complain about double standard being in the same general direction (i.e. the ban hammer coming down much faster on anyone arguing against whatever the majority opinion is here) before it becomes enough data points to matter?
Well, it depends on what you mean. If you mean how many data points before we care—we already care. That's why I take the time to respond to these things.
If you mean how many data points before we change our mind—it's not a numeric function. I know how we do things and why, and I know that there isn't that kind of double standard.
