Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Perhaps it was reduced by a percentage for contributory negligence I’m not sure OP would know all the facts (he just knows he dosent have to pay)



I think the term you mean is comparative negligence.

Contributory negligence would decline all coverage if the insured in any way contributed to the event.

I'm guessing the hotel filed a property damage claim with their insurance, who then sued the commenter, whose liability insurance worked things out with the hotel's insurance company.

You're right, the commenter would be covered 100%, but their insurance might have only paid out a fraction.


Ah, I’m an Australian lawyer and used a term of art which you might not in the states.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributory_negligence (apparently it’s a similar concept you have in comparative negligence)




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: