Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Out of curiosity, what did the cap table look like when they suggested that? Was there a good chunk of equity floating around your current/former employees?

I know some VCs have dilution/ownership thresholds and they might have been trying to find a way to get in on your raise without bending their own rules. But it is really offensive to your employees, I know if my company did that I would walk.




No. He gave the “you gotta stay to play” speech. Our cap table was exceptionally clean and disciplined. It was purely some ego bullshit.


It's beyond despicable to try to get a company to renege on their prior agreements in order to satisfy your own arbitrary rule set.


It's begging for a lawsuit at worst and mass resignation at best among the early hires. I just want to know the twisted rationalization!


I think that they spotted a way to sweeten the deal by making early vestors that had already left the company pay for it.

Typical account thinking.

Pro tip: stay away from VCs run by accountants or lawyers, always go for the ones run by entrepreneurs.


Ok, I will say this: this was a former entrepreneur at a very high profile perceived-brand-as-tier-1 guy running the independent capital investment arm of a very high profile company.


Ugh. Makes you wonder how the early hires in his company made out.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: