And a non-random data set will produce clusters of correlations which don’t have causal explanations. I’m well aware of this axiom which is why I found it important to address.

And if there were such clusters beyond pure random noise, they'd show up in studies. They don't, hence they're random noise.

How many heads in a row would you expect from an unbiased coin if you flip it long enough?

That is your "clusters of correlation."