Pictures may not have been supplied chronologically.
Seriously: the number of people that can be counted on to should 'fake' at any kind of story that is outside of their personal experience is a bit tiring.
Keep in mind that absolutely nobody has anything to gain by being found out to be 'the girl that faked having cancer' with their face and half their life's story out for the whole world to relate to. That doesn't mean fakes do not happen, but what it does mean is that absent hard evidence shouting 'fake' is just another low brow dismissal.
And there is plenty of evidence that proves that it is a real story, including hospital pictures, pictures of the vehicle, pictures of her in happier times and so on. Skepticism is fine but let's not overdo it.
Some of us read every post, top to bottom, end to end, including those missing from the chronology. You decided to refute any criticism, clearly without taking the time to read even one of the original posts.
You didn't even bother to read the post you responded to, or you'd realise it was essentially supporting your uninformed position. You have a made a name for yourself by being vocal, but it takes more than that. Step up or step out.
Seriously: the number of people that can be counted on to should 'fake' at any kind of story that is outside of their personal experience is a bit tiring.
Keep in mind that absolutely nobody has anything to gain by being found out to be 'the girl that faked having cancer' with their face and half their life's story out for the whole world to relate to. That doesn't mean fakes do not happen, but what it does mean is that absent hard evidence shouting 'fake' is just another low brow dismissal.
And there is plenty of evidence that proves that it is a real story, including hospital pictures, pictures of the vehicle, pictures of her in happier times and so on. Skepticism is fine but let's not overdo it.