In that same section, the blog describes the behavior of 'go install foo@latest' and contrasts it to how the default install "in some ecosystems bypass pinning."

That is also a difference in default behavior between Go and Cargo.

To install a 'foo' binary, 'go install foo@latest' gives you the latest version of foo, but the direct and indirect dependencies used are the versions listed in foo's go.mod or a dependency’s go.mod file (and not whatever the latest versions of those direct and indirect dependencies might be at the moment the install is invoked).

'cargo install foo' supports the optional --locked flag, but its not the default behavior: [1]

> By default, the Cargo.lock file that is included with the package will be ignored. This means that Cargo will recompute which versions of dependencies to use, possibly using newer versions that have been released since the package was published. The --locked flag can be used to force Cargo to use the packaged Cargo.lock file if it is available.

There are definitely pros and cons here, but to my knowledge it is not "just NPM" that is being contrasted in the blog.

Finally, I'm no world-class Rust expert, but I like using Cargo. I think Cargo is a fantastic tool that set the bar for package mangers, and it has done great things for the Rust community. But it is easier for communities to learn from each other with a base understanding of where & why different choices have been made, which is part of what is behind some of my comments around Go's behavior. ;-)

[1]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/commands/cargo-install.html

So, I believe that you're confusing two different cases here.

`cargo install` is not how you add a dependency, it's not like `npm install`. `cargo install` downloads the source for and installs a runnable binary program, like `npm install -g`. Cargo does not currently have an "add this dependency to my Cargo.toml" command built-in, but `cargo add` is coming from this purpose.

With `cargo install`, the default behavior is to completely recompute the dependency tree before doing the build. The `--locked` flag modifies that to use the lockfile included in the package to do that build instead (and in fact fail compilation if it does not exist). That lockfile will still be a full graph of all dependencies and transitive dependencies to build the binary, it doesn't like, recurse or use any lockfiles that exist in any of the dependencies' packages.

Hi Steve, first, thanks for weighing in here!

I might have misunderstood your comment, but in my GP comment I was indeed attempting to contrast 'go install foo@latest' with 'cargo install foo', which both install binaries. (I wasn't talking about 'go get bar@latest', which now is just for updating or adding dependencies to a project).

Also, I'm contrasting what happens by default at the moment either binary install command is run. My understanding is Cargo's (non-default) 'cargo install --locked foo' behavior is similar to the default behavior of 'go install foo@latest'. In other words, the default behavior is fairly different between 'cargo install foo' (without --locked) vs. 'go install foo@latest'.

I edited my GP comment to simplify the example to use 'foo' in both cases. Maybe that helps?

Ah yes, I did miss that, thank you / sorry :) Too many sub-threads around here!

I don't know go install's semantics well enough to know if that comparison is true or not, I'm just trying to make sure that Cargo's semantics are clear :)

This is, roughly, what "go install" does:

It will copy a binary to $GOBIN. If the binary is not built, it will be built from source. If the source is not available on the local system, it will be fetched.

During the build, any dependencies of the build target not available of the local system will be fetched.