> But to me, it seems pretty random and poorly thought out.
I agree with this, it's not a move I personally would do, but yet I can't condemn it either. Lashing out like this when faced with the horrors of war makes sense to me.
> What I don't agree with is the idea of structuring society to benefit antifragile people and encourage more to become such.
I agree with the sentiment here, but on some level I feel that an increase in antifragility is necessary to combat the centralization of power. It strikes me as the only way to prevent bad actors in positions of power for ruining it for everyone else.
I agree with this, it's not a move I personally would do, but yet I can't condemn it either. Lashing out like this when faced with the horrors of war makes sense to me.
> What I don't agree with is the idea of structuring society to benefit antifragile people and encourage more to become such.
I agree with the sentiment here, but on some level I feel that an increase in antifragility is necessary to combat the centralization of power. It strikes me as the only way to prevent bad actors in positions of power for ruining it for everyone else.