Curation usually implies more than bookmarking a bunch of sites. I see no additional data, no opinions, no insight. This is hardly useful to me -- and I would love a well-curated list like this.
I agree. A curated list would whittle the list down to a much more manageable size. Most of the things listed are either very obvious (i.e. if you don't know what Ruby on Rails is before reading that list, you're not likely to find any value from reading it from among the list of other frameworks, or even know why you'd want to pick a Ruby exclusive option) or are unnecessary for startups.
I'm sure it took a long time to bookmark all those pages, but the time would have been better spent picking a handful of useful resources and explaining why they are useful.
