I support other countries establishing free speech laws. And in general the protection of non-US citizen speech within the US, especially foreign reporters.
But that doesn't have anything to do with constitutionally protecting 3rd party nations using platforms/speech for propaganda in our (or any other opposing) country.
Seems ridiculous on its face to try to confuse or equate the two and argue the point.
But that doesn't have anything to do with constitutionally protecting 3rd party nations using platforms/speech for propaganda in our (or any other opposing) country.
Seems ridiculous on its face to try to confuse or equate the two and argue the point.