"The problem is I'm older now, I'm 40 years old, and this stuff doesn't change the world. It really doesn't.
I'm sorry, it's true. Having children really changes your view on these things. We're born, we live for a brief instant, and we die. It's been happening for a long time. Technology is not changing it much — if at all. These technologies can make life easier, can let us touch people we might not otherwise. You may have a child with a birth defect and be able to get in touch with other parents and support groups, get medical information, the latest experimental drugs. These things can profoundly influence life. I'm not downplaying that.
But it's a disservice to constantly put things in this radical new light — that it's going to change everything. Things don't have to change the world to be important."
I wonder if this was a tip of the hat to Jobs, or a slight to Edison? I came into this thread expecting a few Edison jabs from technically minded folk.
"The problem is I'm older now, I'm 40 years old, and this stuff doesn't change the world. It really doesn't. I'm sorry, it's true. Having children really changes your view on these things. We're born, we live for a brief instant, and we die. It's been happening for a long time. Technology is not changing it much — if at all. These technologies can make life easier, can let us touch people we might not otherwise. You may have a child with a birth defect and be able to get in touch with other parents and support groups, get medical information, the latest experimental drugs. These things can profoundly influence life. I'm not downplaying that. But it's a disservice to constantly put things in this radical new light — that it's going to change everything. Things don't have to change the world to be important."
February 1996 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.02/jobs_pr.html