It’s good that this is listed in the terms, but this raises two concerns:
1) People don’t read terms. Should they? Yes. Do they? No.
2) This language is more like a disclaimer than a term of use. I would not assume that disclaimers about the accuracy of the result would be found in the terms.
So yes, the terms link is prominent, but no, I don’t think it addresses this issue.
1) People don’t read terms. Should they? Yes. Do they? No.
2) This language is more like a disclaimer than a term of use. I would not assume that disclaimers about the accuracy of the result would be found in the terms.
So yes, the terms link is prominent, but no, I don’t think it addresses this issue.