They would appear capitalised on the cover page, not generally in text.
Here is a recent example from a 2022 SCOTUS opinion.
"In rejecting petitioners’ allegations, the Seventh Circuit did not apply Tibble’s guidance. [...] The court determined that respondents had provided an adequate array of choices, including “the types of funds plaintiffs wanted (low-cost index funds).”"[0]
By contrast, a decision of the High Court of Australia:
"The appellants applied to the Supreme Court of New South Wales for orders
that the third respondent, a former director of Arrium, appear for examination and
produce documents. Orders were also sought for the second respondent (the
auditor) and the bank who advised on the capital raising to produce certain
documents.[1]
Here is a recent example from a 2022 SCOTUS opinion.
"In rejecting petitioners’ allegations, the Seventh Circuit did not apply Tibble’s guidance. [...] The court determined that respondents had provided an adequate array of choices, including “the types of funds plaintiffs wanted (low-cost index funds).”"[0]
By contrast, a decision of the High Court of Australia:
"The appellants applied to the Supreme Court of New South Wales for orders that the third respondent, a former director of Arrium, appear for examination and produce documents. Orders were also sought for the second respondent (the auditor) and the bank who advised on the capital raising to produce certain documents.[1]
[0] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/595/19-1401/
[1] https://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/showCase/2022/HCA/3