I think Dijkstra's joke is about how object oriented programs tend to eschew correctness rather easily. But I don't think he was saying that's a valid approach to solving problems.
Adding new methods to an object to tame complexity seems paradoxical to me. When something becomes too large, I generally prefer to investigate other means of abstraction/extraction/organization available in a given language.
Adding new methods to an object to tame complexity seems paradoxical to me. When something becomes too large, I generally prefer to investigate other means of abstraction/extraction/organization available in a given language.