So...my comment still stands, and your comment still has not aged well--you will not be satisfied with that, right? You'd rather see it eradicated, no? You're not equipped to deal with discussions online because you're not really thinking. So of course you prefer censorship.
It's flagged it's not deleted. You can still read it. A flag is a viewpoint of some people.
These sorts of discussions degrade the discourse, and I'd rather engage on topic points--and I am making an important point about people's reactions to info different to the info in their heads: rather than thinking, critically, they want to name-call (and censor 'internally' in their own heads), or censor.
Heh, go back to hitting the gym, man. You’re better at that.
Flagged [dead]. Not deleted. It does make it invisible tho.
(if you don’t put “showdead” on. You were the first to educate me in that, thank you.)
So…I guess I should post it again, then?
The-sis Ris-ing!
> Canceling Joe will be the West's Free speech Kristallnacht.
> Please do not equate podcasts with the actual Holocaust. (Ironically, equating the vaccine with the Holocaust is what got JRE in trouble in the first place)
> No, I'll say whatever I want. You're not happy about it? You'll just have to deal with your feelings. It's an analogy not an equation. Are you trying to say we can't invoke historical evils to talk about present ones? That's as bad as Holocaust deniers, and "ironically", that sort of verboten helped enable the Holocaust, whose memory you are only pretending to protect, but actually undermining.
> Not really. Your comments will probably be deleted.
But even if these things are deleted, or hidden for most...that's not great about censorship. Arguments disallowed because some people can't exercise control over their emotions and instead want to incorrectly try to blame others for them?...and then impose their will on others and restrict their freedoms? That's wrong. It's awful and it's the whole mess we're getting into and what I'm highlighting. And you folks want to use the same tactics again. That's so wrong. It's the same type of verboten that helped enabled the Holocaust by stifling dissent to the Nazis propaganda, plus, then abusing the sacred protection afforded by a defense of the victims of Nazis as cover for imposing your own emotional immaturity on others? That's an abomination.
It's flagged it's not deleted. You can still read it. A flag is a viewpoint of some people.
These sorts of discussions degrade the discourse, and I'd rather engage on topic points--and I am making an important point about people's reactions to info different to the info in their heads: rather than thinking, critically, they want to name-call (and censor 'internally' in their own heads), or censor.