I am pretty much in touch, contrary to you that argues for C++ no matter what, yet we seldom see any public work from you other than asserting how C++ is great and anything else is bad.
Apparently in your eagerness to once again argue for C++ in yet another C++ comment you translated "naturally Scott Meyers can't write books forever." as if I hasn't aware of the fact that he has left the community long time ago.
Apparently those words cannot have any other meaning as I am out of touch with what Scott Meyer does, otherwise how could you use it.
Anyone that bothers can assert many of my statements with public stuff from me on the Internet, they can even find naive Usenet stuff from me all the way back to 1994.
Prove us that your "expert C++ knowledge about the real market usage" is to be taken seriously and not polluting HN with C++ zealotry.
Apparently in your eagerness to once again argue for C++ in yet another C++ comment you translated "naturally Scott Meyers can't write books forever." as if I hasn't aware of the fact that he has left the community long time ago.
Apparently those words cannot have any other meaning as I am out of touch with what Scott Meyer does, otherwise how could you use it.
Anyone that bothers can assert many of my statements with public stuff from me on the Internet, they can even find naive Usenet stuff from me all the way back to 1994.
Prove us that your "expert C++ knowledge about the real market usage" is to be taken seriously and not polluting HN with C++ zealotry.