Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> This is an oversimplification. Building lower you get lower population density, and need to spend way more co2 on transportation and infrastructure.

There are diminishing returns with density and (transportation) energy use:

* https://www.grida.no/resources/5414

* https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter4/environment...

IMHO getting to 50-75 inhabitants per hectare, which gives <15GJ/person/year (where most EU cities are at), is a good place to aim for. Once you're at 100ppl/ha then there's not much improvement going to 125, 200, or more.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: