I find the notion of allowing an organization with zero reputation to censor a peer reviewed medical journal that has been continuously published since 1840 to be particularly ridiculous.
That may be a charitable assessment.
> censor a peer reviewed medical journal
Is Facebook's content moderation actually censorship? Certainly the BMJ is still free to publish whatever it wants, as it always has.
What obligation (legal or otherwise) does Facebook have to permit content it doesn't approve of (for whatever reason) to be published on its platform?
I find the notion of allowing an organization with zero reputation to censor a peer reviewed medical journal that has been continuously published since 1840 to be particularly ridiculous.