Not only is the blog post from 2 and a half years ago, but it was bashing the very first alpha release of the V programming language (vlang) that just hit GitHub at that time.
Could you imagine doing a brutal bashing of Zig or Nim, the first week it came out? Then claiming they're vaporware? Make it make sense. An alpha of a programming language, much less a program, isn't feature complete on day one. This should be common sense.
Trying to label a brand new alpha as vaporware is inappropriate at best. A fair and unbiased critic gives a project a reasonable period of time to prove itself, not attempt to prematurely stomp all over it. Looks wrong to do so, at the least.
Even crazier is then using that very old blog post, as the "be all, say all" for the state of the V language versus actually looking on GitHub and the documentation. V has been consistently coming out with weekly releases (https://github.com/vlang/v/releases) and updates for years now.
Could you imagine doing a brutal bashing of Zig or Nim, the first week it came out? Then claiming they're vaporware? Make it make sense. An alpha of a programming language, much less a program, isn't feature complete on day one. This should be common sense.
Trying to label a brand new alpha as vaporware is inappropriate at best. A fair and unbiased critic gives a project a reasonable period of time to prove itself, not attempt to prematurely stomp all over it. Looks wrong to do so, at the least.
Even crazier is then using that very old blog post, as the "be all, say all" for the state of the V language versus actually looking on GitHub and the documentation. V has been consistently coming out with weekly releases (https://github.com/vlang/v/releases) and updates for years now.