That's why we should use the term CRAP instead of DRM
Content Restriction Access Management would cover all content, including liquid ink.
Though you can argue that "digital" in this case is referring to the chip and reader. These are infact digital components restricting access to liquid.
I can see the CRAM/CRAP bill advance it's way to the Senate floor. Would love to ask my local congressperson "What's your stance on CRAP?" and watch him try to say "I'm all for CRAP it's good for business, and if CRAM/CRAP is good for business, it's good for the little guy." If someone can get this done, I'm running for office on a NO CRAP platform.
Content Restriction Access Management would cover all content, including liquid ink.
Though you can argue that "digital" in this case is referring to the chip and reader. These are infact digital components restricting access to liquid.