Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>Both pieces cite a Sky News interview with Gates that ran this week, wherein Gates is asked if it would be helpful to change intellectual property law in order to enable "the recipe for these vaccines to be shared."

> Gates answers, "No," which by itself could be interpreted as him standing up for intellectual property law and refusing to share vaccine formulas with developing nations. But then Gates goes on to answer the inevitable follow up question: "Why not?"

> The reason, Gates said, is due to the complexity of manufacturing safe vaccines.

> "There are only so many vaccine factories in the world, and people are very serious about the safety of vaccines," he said. "The thing that's holding things back in this case isn't intellectual property. It's not like there's some idle vaccine factory with regulatory approval that makes magically safe vaccines. You've gotta do the trials on these things. And every manufacturing process has to be looked at in a very careful way."

> Moreover, Gates said getting COVID vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson to share vaccine formulas has already happened — such as the case with India.

> "We got all the rights from the vaccine companies," he said. "They didn't hold it back, they were participating."




Those are Gates' claims, yes, while many vaccine manufacturers were explicitly saying this is BS and they are perfectly ready to produce these vaccines if they are given the go-ahead.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: