I guess I understand the cynicism but her net worth appears to be not much. Usually you'd want to use your money to avoid getting convicted but here we are.

It's non-violent. Nobody died. I think 5-10 years. Maybe she can be Shkreli's pen pal.

Wrong. Someone committed suicide because of her and her legal team's harassment and blackmailing.

> It's non-violent. Nobody died.

She was peddling non functional healthcare devices and services. People could have died, and she clearly didn't care.

Wasn't it mostly vapor ware medical testing services? Afaik they mainly wasted investor time and money and took customer money for test services they just never ended up providing. Unless I'm missing something??

I think their customers just ended up stuck with the bill and had to go to a regular lab.

Would you actually be willing to bet money on this 1 to 1? I. e. that Holmes serves no days in prison.

I totally would. She's a blonde haired, blue-eyed white woman!

Holmes is not particularly attractive. Martha Stewart was (accounting for age) attractive and somewhat beloved in the US and served time. I don't think Holmes really has anyone in her corner when it comes to a 'beauty pass'.

"She's a blonde haired, blue-eyed white woman!"

What does that mean to you? I am curious to know why you'd make that bet with the OP with those two facts alone.

-Three.-

Edit: Duh, four.

Does she still have any significant net worth? It's not like her stock is still worth anything.

Her baby daddy is extremely wealthy.

Wikipedia says that she was in a relationship with her business partner up until Theranos fell apart.

She then married her current spouse.

"Baby daddy" is often used to imply that the woman is not really attracted or attached to the man who fathered a child.

I think OP is implying that Holmes hooked up with and married the new guy as a cynical ploy to get a war chest for the impending legal actions.

I can't speak at all to Holmes' motivations, but it certainly doesn't conflict with what I read on Wikipedia, or with her apparent ethics.

Women aren’t always married to their baby’s daddy.

Not exactly sure where the term came from, but I know I’ve heard it in songs, seen it in movies and on TV, etc. It’s just a popular phrase.

> It’s just a popular phrase.

Yes. And, as the G(GG...?)P said, a stupid one.

You dont have to be married to have a child.

she is not currently jailed. i saw on the news this morning after her guilty verdict walking out with her lawyer. i don't believe they jail you until sentencing for white collar crimes since you aren't a "threat" to the general public

Sorry seems I was unclear in my wording.

I said soon to be sentenced.

And words towards 'won't she be in jail through any appeal process.'

But in response to the original comment saying she won't get jail time at all due to appeals, do you think she will not be sentenced and the appeal with happen before then where they disregard this conviction during that process?

Anyway, confusion aside I was trying to politely point out they seem wrong in their assumption she will never see jail due to an appeal process. That's not how the process works.

You slightly misunderstood my cynicism: I don't think they'll overturn this convinction and cancel her sentence.

I think she'll only start serving time once the very last round of appeals ends - which is going to be many years after her death. They'll just Jarndyce v Jarndyce for decades to come.