"The Divisional Court found that the Math Proficiency Test had an adverse impact on entry to the teaching profession for racialized teacher candidates and other reasonable alternatives should have been implemented."
Ontario.
Also Ontario:
"Haha teachers of color too dumb to pass a simple math test"
The real question here is: who's going to suffer from subpar teachers?
Rich people who can run away from bad schools (through private schools or private mentoring or any other means) or poor students?
This is exactly the point of the ruling. If education and good jobs are distributed based on class, then rich people can ensure that their kids get them. A meritocracy is risky to the people at the top (like the judges on the Divisional Court) because they could lose their slot to smart poor people. Of course they will say they are doing it to help poor and disadvantaged people to give themselves moral cover.
It is a real question and not a factor for the government’s involvement.
Yes, the parallel private system will attract the people that can access it. If that is money based then the private system can attract better teaching talent and screen them however they want.
Not sure what answer you wanted to read. Its not a factor for the state.
The state is the number one influencer of the quality of the schooling systems; one of the measures is to hire qualified teachers, for example by testing them as part of the selection process. But any testing that makes someone fail is unconstitutional, it seems, so they should hire anyone with no criteria.
Ontario.
Also Ontario:
"Haha teachers of color too dumb to pass a simple math test"
The real question here is: who's going to suffer from subpar teachers?
Rich people who can run away from bad schools (through private schools or private mentoring or any other means) or poor students?