They seem to do a rare (once a year or so) push of whatever they've developed into a public source repo, and then just leave it there. No updates, no bug fixes, no community involvement, etc.
Their site looks like they're trying to sell me something, but there's no commercial product in evidence. And the whole thing seems to be done under the auspices of a university.
There's a link to their supposed development branch, bizarrely on launchpad instead of Google Code where they seem largely based, but it's empty.
I'm not really inclined to put time and effort into something whose model and motivation completely escapes and/or scares me.
We're very much graduate students and our testing cycle takes a lot of time away from doing research and publishing papers. We try to keep the main branch as stable as possible though for those who just want to get the latest and greatest. Our branches are pretty active and we do track issues/bugs and fix them, although you're right that we don't do so on our Google Code page.
https://code.launchpad.net/~appscale-maintainers/appscale/ap...
* Making some sort of statement on the Google Code page about your development practices and the fact that the bleeding edge is on Launchpad. People like me go to a Google Code page expecting to see the development site, complete with an active source tree, and get very confused when that's not what it really is.
They seem to do a rare (once a year or so) push of whatever they've developed into a public source repo, and then just leave it there. No updates, no bug fixes, no community involvement, etc.
Their site looks like they're trying to sell me something, but there's no commercial product in evidence. And the whole thing seems to be done under the auspices of a university.
There's a link to their supposed development branch, bizarrely on launchpad instead of Google Code where they seem largely based, but it's empty.
I'm not really inclined to put time and effort into something whose model and motivation completely escapes and/or scares me.