Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The workers simply have a lot less leverage than you think. Globalization and automation has made work less scarce than labor. The pandemic reduced the supply of labor, and accordingly, wages for low-skill workers have skyrocketed, which proves that the market is working as intended.

Unions don't magically create leverage out of thin air. They steal it from those outside the union by constraining the the supply of labor. The most effective unions are those that do this to the greatest extent. For example, SAG-AFTRA forces productions to give speaking roles to union members and also restricts union eligibility to those that receive these speaking roles.




> Unions don't magically create leverage out of thin air. They steal it from those outside the union by constraining the the supply of labor.

That sounds like a perspective from one of Amazon's workplace signs. Union leverage is based on two things (off the top of my head, and afaik): significant control of the labor supply, and the political power of many votes and of many people to advocate for candidates. However, people can join the union; they aren't exclusive clubs.

Much of management's power comes from controlling the job supply and the political power of money, and they use that leverage to their advantage. When we live in a happy world where management stops doing that, I'll agree that unions shouldn't either.


> SAG-AFTRA forces productions to give speaking roles to union members and also restricts union eligibility

SAG does not force productions to do anything. The production can either use union or not use union. What they can't do is use cherry pick talent. Your best talent is going to be a SAG member. And since it's a union you either get all or none.


>SAG does not force productions to do anything

I'm merely applying the same language people use here to attack corporations.

>And since it's a union you either get all or none.

Everywhere else this would be a clear violation to antitrust.


> Everywhere else this would be a clear violation to antitrust

What?


"You either sell only laptops with intel CPU's or we will ship no CPU's to you at all!"

Sounds like a clear antitrust case to me.


Exclusivity clauses like that are perfectly legal except in a few rare cases where companies have an unusually high amount of market dominance.


"Your best talent is going to be a SAG member." Sounds like market dominance to me.


"Union" and "trust" even mean the same thing.


> They steal it from those outside the union by constraining the the supply of labor.

Can you explain how this works? In Europe Unions just represent the rights of those the Employer chose to hire. The employees are not required to be members of a Union, and usually they won't join until they have already started working.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: