It’s the crypto people that have to prove that their stuff means something, the burden of proof is on them

What happened to "What is stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."?

What happens to the claims that crypto is something but after 12 years it is still a solution in search of a (legal) problem.

Nobody has anything to show for it.

And you can state the article is conjecture all you want, but if you don’t substantiate that… welll…