Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bitcoin is smart engineered gold. It's perfectly rational compared to the endless printing in fiat. Most engineers just accept keynesian economics because that's what they were taught.

They have a narrow world view beyond their tech expertise. I saw somebody criticize BTC because they couldn't imagine using so much energy "just to secure money". I was like what you just took for granted is perhaps society's most important need and unsolved problem.



The endless printing is more necessary than the strict stock control fot a currency. You cannot avoid people starving unless you do it, and you cannot live in peace unless you avoid people starving and getting desperate.

You do know there was no printing in the middle age. Good old days these all were.


>You do know there was no printing in the middle age. Good old days these all were.

Oh come now, there was plenty of printing in the latter days of Rome or Wiemar Germany and people managed to starve just fine despite it. Inflation correlates with optimistic times because it implies a debt taken on today will be easier to pay off with money earned tomorrow. That doesn't mean printing money reliably makes people optimistic.


I see the world transitioning to a USD central bank digital coin for currency and Bitcoin as the store of value in the future


There will likely be many national currencies, the Digital Yuan comes to mind as a major contender. A global currency increase the risk to larger scale domino effect in the economy.


global economy is much like communicating vessels, large scale domino effect is also possible, having a global currency such as bitcoin disconnected from nation events, is no more riskier than without it.

see China's Evergrande crisis as an example.


Why? What problems would Bitcoin solve?

It can barely keep up with the very few transactions now. Its transaction costs are sky high


"Smart engineered gold" is an oxymoron. Gold is a terrible platform for economic activity, because it is expensive to create and difficult to move/transact with.

Just because it was the best financial technology hundreds of years ago does not make gold, artificial or not, the best financial technology for today.

"Faster horses"...


It's all the good of gold with none of the bad


Bitcoins are both "expensive to create" and "difficult to transact with". It's all of the good with all of the bad, and then some.


Misses out on being able to simply store gold.

Being able to trade gold without technology.

The energy to mine gold is much less (strange, very strange)


Crypto adds it’s own bad parts.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: