No, thank you. I thoroughly enjoyed the article. I also enjoy the title, although it caused some cognitive dissonance by implying that the primary thesis would be: to be careful trying to use trees, where meshes are more appropriate.
Instead the concluding thesis was: "Whenever Possible, Make a Tree" and due to my expectations I thought for a second that I may have accidentally skipped over some section which championed meshes.
Potentially, putting the thesis as a single sentence near the top would prime readers so they can accurately ingest the rest of the article with proper prejudice.
"Whenever Possible, Make a Tree" I've thought about it, but I added " and the Other Way Around" instead, just because I feel the original title gets more glances than the alternatives.
Instead the concluding thesis was: "Whenever Possible, Make a Tree" and due to my expectations I thought for a second that I may have accidentally skipped over some section which championed meshes.
Potentially, putting the thesis as a single sentence near the top would prime readers so they can accurately ingest the rest of the article with proper prejudice.