I find it easier to write a parser by hand than use a parser generator. For most languages (C++ is a notable exception) writing a lexer & parser is a weekend job, and is far and away the easiest part.
C++ looks like it ought to be OK to parse, but turns out to be completely evil. (flamebait mode on) Bit like the rest of the language really. (flamebait apologia: I spend most of my time coding C++; sometimes I even enjoy it...)
Just lexing C++ is a major project, because of the 'phases of translation', the preprocessor, the preprocessor tokens, etc., and then trying to make it fast.
I agree and there used to be (maybe it's still the case) problems with parser generators if you wanted to have good error recovery and reporting to the user. It's also very telling that sometimes--contrary to what people might expect--parsers pose a substantial problem in production systems: http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2010/2/69354-a-few-billion-lin...:
Law: You can't check code you can't parse. Checking code deeply requires understanding the code's semantics. The most basic requirement is that you parse it. Parsing is considered a solved problem. Unfortunately, this view is naïve, rooted in the widely believed myth that programming languages exist.
