I would like to think the consumer would merit a thought, too.
Fiction might be one thing; if it is entertaining, that's enough. But if I'm reading something supposedly nonfiction that is generated by a machine, I want to know provenance.
In the alternative, it should have a human's name attached to say that they've verified it is correct information, and take the reputation hit if it isn't. Given the above discussion of copyright, it seems reasonable enough - if you want to profit from AI output, you should stand behind it.
Fiction might be one thing; if it is entertaining, that's enough. But if I'm reading something supposedly nonfiction that is generated by a machine, I want to know provenance.
In the alternative, it should have a human's name attached to say that they've verified it is correct information, and take the reputation hit if it isn't. Given the above discussion of copyright, it seems reasonable enough - if you want to profit from AI output, you should stand behind it.